In re A.M. CA2/8
Father P.M. appeals the juvenile court’s order denying his request for a contested Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing as to his son, A.M. This is father’s second appeal concerning now five-year-old A.M., who has been a dependent of the court since his birth. (In re A.M. (Nov. 21, 2014, B254164) [nonpub. opn.].) In this appeal, father contends his due process rights were violated when the court denied his request to present evidence of the “beneficial parent-child relationship” exception to the termination of parental rights after hearing his offer of proof. (See § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) Finding no merit in this contention, we affirm the order.
Comments on In re A.M. CA2/8