legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.M. CA2/5
J.M. and M.M., then ages 10 and 6, came to the attention of the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) after the police responded to their parents’ home to quell a disturbance. The juvenile court sustained a Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b)(1) petition based on father’s conduct that placed the children at risk for serious physical harm. The children were removed from father’s custody and permitted to remain with mother; both parents were to be provided services. Father alone appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to assert dependency jurisdiction over the children. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale