In re J.M. CA2/5
J.M. and M.M., then ages 10 and 6, came to the attention of the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) after the police responded to their parents’ home to quell a disturbance. The juvenile court sustained a Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b)(1) petition based on father’s conduct that placed the children at risk for serious physical harm. The children were removed from father’s custody and permitted to remain with mother; both parents were to be provided services. Father alone appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to assert dependency jurisdiction over the children. We affirm.
Comments on In re J.M. CA2/5