legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re T.M. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant J.M. (Mother) has a history of being involved in violent relationships with men and a significant mental health history, resulting in the removal of her 12-year-old son T.M. Mother appeals from the juvenile court’s visitation order. She argues the court failed to make a specific visitation order, thereby improperly delegating discretion to the legal guardians. We find that the juvenile court erred in failing to make an appropriate visitation order at the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing to ensure that visitation with Mother, at a minimum level determined by the court, would occur. We accordingly reverse the portion of the order regarding Mother’s visitation and remand the matter to the juvenile court to make an appropriate visitation order consistent with this opinion. In all other respects, we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale