Daniel H. v. Superior Court CA4/3
Daniel H. (Father) is the father of Adam H. (Adam), who was born in June 2015 and taken into protective custody the following month. By petition for writ of mandate, Father challenges the juvenile court’s order, made following a contested 18 month review hearing, terminating his reunification services and setting a permanency planning hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 (further code references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code). That hearing is set for September 13, 2017.
The Orange County Social Services Agency (SSA) has filed opposition to Father’s writ petition. Counsel for Adam has joined in the arguments made by SSA. Adam’s mother, I.Z., (Mother) does not challenge the juvenile court’s order terminating her reunification services.
Father contends the juvenile court erred by finding (1) there was a substantial risk of detriment to return Adam to Father’s care and (2) Father was offered or provided reasonable reunification services. W
Comments on Daniel H. v. Superior Court CA4/3