P. v. Cervantes CA2/7
Raul Cervantes was convicted by a jury of two counts of assault with a deadly weapon. On appeal Cervantes contends the victims’ in-court identifications of him were tainted by an unduly suggestive field identification procedure and should have been excluded. He also contends the court erred in failing to rule on his motion for a mistrial following the introduction of that evidence. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Cervantes CA2/7