P. v. Pena
Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of first degree murder. Defendant contends the trial court erred by failing to exclude a confession he made after his arrest on another charge, arguing that the police elicited the confession in violation of his constitutional rights. Defendant also claims the trial court erred by instructing the jury with CALJIC No. 8.25. After a thorough review of the record, court found no prejudicial error and affirmed judgment.
Comments on P. v. Pena