P. v. Majedaad CA6
Defendant Nassim Lebnan Majedaad pleaded no contest to grand theft (Pen. Code, §§ 484, 487, subd. (a)) and money laundering (§ 186.10, subd. (a)). The trial court placed defendant on probation for three years with various terms and conditions. After a contested restitution hearing, the court ordered defendant to pay restitution totaling $67,400.33 to seven financial institutions.
On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion by awarding the full amount of restitution requested. Specifically, defendant argues (1) there was not substantial evidence that one of the financial institutions, Chase Bank, suffered a loss, and (2) there was a dispute about whether defendant had made offsetting payments to some of the financial institutions and the court refused to examine available records to resolve the issue. Defendant also contends that his federal constitutional right to due process was violated.
Comments on P. v. Majedaad CA6