In re Ulices V.
The minor appeals from the juvenile court's order revoking his probation under Welfare and Institutions Code section 777. The minor contends that he was denied his constitutional rights to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses because the court's findings were based upon inadmissible hearsay. The minor further argues that absent the inadmissible hearsay there was insufficient evidence that he violated his probation. Court affirmed.
Comments on In re Ulices V.