Carroll v. Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff Gerald Carroll defaulted on a $1.9 million loan and sued various institutions for declaratory relief, negligence, quiet title, slander of title, unfair business practices (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200), and cancellation of instruments. He appeals from the judgment entered following the sustaining of defendants’ demurrer to his second amended complaint for negligence and unfair business practices without leave to amend. His argument on appeal, however, is limited to the trial court’s ruling sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer to the cause of action for declaratory relief alleged in the first amended complaint (FAC). Finding no error, we affirm.
Comments on Carroll v. Bank of America, N.A.