legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Filler v. City of Santa Monica CA2/2
Appellant Aaron G. Filler (Filler) appeals from an order granting respondents the City of Santa Monica (City), Margaret Griffin (Griffin), as an individual and in her official capacity as an Architectural Review Board member/commissioner, and John Enright’s (Enright) (collectively, Respondents) special motions to strike the first (inverse condemnation), second (qui tam action for enforcement of Santa Monica Municipal Code, part 9.04.14.110(c)), fourth (unjust enrichment), fifth (denial of equal protection), and sixth (intrinsic fraud on the court) causes of action contained in the first amended complaint pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, hereinafter, the anti-SLAPP statute. Filler also appeals from the judgment of dismissal after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer filed by the City and Griffin, in her official capacity, to the seventh cause of action (void for vagueness challenge to land use regulation).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale