Miller v. Office of Administrative Hearings CA
Michael Miller (appellant) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of mandate. Through the writ of mandate, appellant sought to set aside the Los Angeles Community College District’s (LACCD) termination of his employment. Appellant argues that the termination is invalid because LACCD failed to comply with certain statutory requirements. Further, he argues that the termination lacks evidentiary support. If the termination is not reversed, appellant contends that he is entitled to backpay for the interim period between the issuance of a prior writ of mandamus by the superior court and issuance of an amended decision by the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).
We find no error and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Comments on Miller v. Office of Administrative Hearings CA