P. v. Crownover CA2/1
Defendant and appellant Gary Crownover challenges his conviction for robbery, in violation of Penal Code section 211. Crownover contends that the trial court violated his right to due process by allowing evidence of an out-of-court identification that he alleges was unduly suggestive and unreliable. He also contends that the trial court erred by allowing the prosecutor to recall him as a witness, and that the prosecutor committed misconduct by making improper arguments during closing argument. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Crownover CA2/1