In re Q.C.
Appellant, mother of a dependant child, appeals from an order after a selection and implementation hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 that terminated her parental rights, and found child to be adoptable.
Mother contends that the order must be reversed, without any showing of prejudice, because her guardian ad litem, who was also an attorney at law, substituted for her appointed counsel at the section 366.26 hearing, and performed the dual role of guardian ad litem and counsel for appellant. Court held that the error, if any, would require reversal only upon a showing of prejudice, and affirms.
Comments on In re Q.C.