P. v. Lafkas CA1/3
Defendant Michael Lafkas was convicted by a jury of committing multiple sexual offenses against several minor girls. He appeals his two convictions under Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a) and his one conviction under section 288, subdivision (c)(1) for committing lewd acts on his minor stepdaughter, Jane Doe (Jane). He argues these convictions resulted from incorrect and cumulatively prejudicial evidentiary rulings and that one of them was not supported by substantial evidence. He further contends the trial court erred by declining to suspend the criminal proceedings to hold a competency hearing. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Lafkas CA1/3