legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Ryan P. CA2/4
Ryan P., Sr. (Father) appeals from a dispositional order of the juvenile court, declining to place his son, Ryan P., Jr. (Ryan) with paternal relatives and declining to order reunification services for Father. Father contends the juvenile court erred in failing to make the findings required under Welfare and Institutions Code sections 361, subdivision (c), and 361.2. He further contends that the court’s finding under section 361.2 was not supported by substantial evidence. In the alternative, he contends that the court erred in denying him reunification services under section 361.5. We conclude that the juvenile court’s finding under section 361.2 is not supported by clear and convincing evidence and therefore reverse.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale