Moller v. Deco Industries CA3
In this case, plaintiff Corinne Moller, acting in her capacity as a taxpayer, sought to challenge a 2005 contract between defendant Lake Shastina Community Services District (the district) and defendant DECO Industries, LLC (DECO) and also sought to challenge a 2015 settlement agreement between the same parties. The trial court sustained demurrers without leave to amend on the grounds that Moller’s challenge to the 2005 contract was time-barred and she lacked standing to challenge the 2015 settlement agreement. Finding no error in the trial court’s ruling, we affirm.
Comments on Moller v. Deco Industries CA3