P. v. Fourdyce
Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence and quash and traverse the search warrant pursuant to which the evidence was seized, appellant pled no contest to possession of methamphetamine and operating a “chop shop.” The court imposed a prison term of two years.
On appeal, appellant’s sole contention is that the court erred in denying his motion to traverse. Specifically, he argues that the trial court erred in concluding that although the affidavit supporting the warrant did not establish probable cause for the search, under what is commonly called the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule announced in United States v. Leon, suppression was not required. Court affirms.
Comments on P. v. Fourdyce