legal news


Register | Forgot Password

L.H. v. Superior Court CA1/3
Petitioners L.H. (Mother) and R.T. (Father), parents of six-year-old C.T. and one-year-old L.T., challenge the Contra Costa County Superior Court’s May 25, 2017 order terminating family reunification services and setting a permanency hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code, section 366.26 (366.26 hearing). They contend there was no clear and convincing evidence that either of them had failed to participate in court-ordered treatment. Father also contends the Contra Costa County Children and Family Services Bureau (Bureau) did not provide reasonable services and that the court erred by reducing his visitation when it terminated reunification services. For the reasons given below, we deny their petitions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale