In re A.V. CA4/1
P.V. (mother) appeals from an order in which the juvenile court declined to return her children L.V., V.V., J.V. and A.V. to her custody after her 18-month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22) and found it was in the children's best interests that she be provided with an additional six months of reunification services. Mother contends the court's finding is not supported by substantial evidence; that the evidence shows returning the children to her custody would not be detrimental because she had actively participated in reunification services, was capable of meeting the children's special needs, and had resolved the issues that brought the children into the dependency system. We conclude the court did not err; that evidence of the children's special educational, developmental, and mental health needs, the social worker's conclusions as to mother's present inability to care for those needs, and mother's questionable judgment generally, supports
Comments on In re A.V. CA4/1