In re E.W. CA4/2
Defendants and appellants D.W. (Father) and N.O. (Mother; collectively, Parents) appeal after the termination of their parental rights for G.W. and E.W. (collectively, the Children) at a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing.
Father claims on appeal the juvenile court erred when it denied his section 388 petition without a hearing. Mother makes the following claims on appeal, in addition to joining in Father’s arguments: (1) the juvenile court erred by denying her section 388 petition because she showed changed circumstances, and it was in the Children’s best interests to be returned to her, or that she receive additional reunification services; (2) the juvenile court erred by finding the parental bond exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i) did not apply; and (3) the juvenile court should have ordered a permanent plan of legal guardianship rather than adoption.
Comments on In re E.W. CA4/2