P. v. Arizpe CA6
Following a plea bargain in a case involving a registrable sex offense, defendant Ivan Arizpe was placed on probation for three years, subject to various conditions.
On appeal, Arizpe challenges several of his probation conditions, including those which: (1) require his consent to polygraph examinations; (2) require that he waive his psychotherapist-patient privilege and his privilege against self-incrimination; (3) limit his right to associate; and (4) preclude him from purchasing or possessing sexually-explicit material. He also argues the trial court erred by imposing booking fees and probation supervision costs without determining he had the ability to pay such fees. In the alternative, if the court finds this argument is forfeited due to trial counsel’s failure to object, Arizpe contends his counsel rendered ineffective assistance.
We find that the appeal is moot with respect to Arizpe’s probation conditions. We further find that Arizpe forfeited any claim of error wi
Comments on P. v. Arizpe CA6