P. v. Roxanne A. CA5
Appointed counsel for defendant Roxanne A. asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We sent a letter to defendant, advising her of her right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. Defendant responded with a 44-page supplemental brief in which she contends defense counsel was ineffective for various reasons, and explains the existence of a “Widespread Criminal Chain Conspiracy” and a lack of jurisdiction in Madera County. We find no arguable issues.
Comments on P. v. Roxanne A. CA5