legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Wright CA2/2
Counsel filed an opening brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, and requested this court to independently review the record on appeal to determine whether any arguable issues exist.
We sent a notice to defendant, advising him he had 30 days in which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. He has submitted supplemental briefs in which he contends (1) he did not commit the charged crimes and did not understand that he was pleading no contest to all six charges and (2) there is insufficient evidence to support the finding that he violated his probation. Defendant’s first claim is not cognizable on appeal. There is substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that defendant violated his probation. We affirm the trial court’s order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale