legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Deal v. Home Depot
Appellant, appeals from a judgment entered awarding him $3000 for false imprisonment against respondent Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Home Depot). On appeal appellant contends that the trial court erred in a number of its rulings on motions in limine. After he filed his opening brief, Home Depot moved to dismiss the appeal, arguing that appellant had accepted the fruits of the judgment and therefore is barred from the prosecution of the appeal. Finding merit in Home Depot's contention, we grant the motion to dismiss the appeal.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale