P. v. Faust CA4/3
Elliot Roland Faust appeals from the trial court’s order revoking his parole and sentencing him to 180 days in custody. (See Pen. Code, §§ 1203.2, 3000.08; all statutory citations are to the Penal Code.) Faust contends there was insufficient evidence he willfully violated parole by failing to charge his GPS tracking device. He also argues a number of the terms and conditions of his parole are unconstitutional and therefore we must strike or modify them. As explained below, we affirm the order revoking parole, but direct modification of one parole condition.
Comments on P. v. Faust CA4/3