legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Satterfield CA4/1
A jury found Kenneth Eugene Satterfield guilty of forcible rape (count 1; Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(2)), forcible sexual penetration (count 2; § 289, subd. (a)(1)(A)), and forcible oral copulation (count 3; § 288a, subd. (c)(2)(A)). The jury also found true several enhancement allegations attached to each count, namely, that Satterfield personally used a deadly weapon and tied and bound the victim within the meaning of section 667.61, subdivisions (a), (c), and (e), personally used a deadly weapon within the meaning of section 667.61, subdivisions (b), (c), and (e), tied or bound the victim within the meaning of section 667.61, subdivisions (b), (c), and (e), and committed the crimes during the commission of a first degree burglary and a second degree burglary within the meaning of section 667.61, subdivisions (a), (c), and (d) and subdivisions (b), (c), and (e).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale