P. v. Rosette CA4/1
A jury found Douglas Vladimir Rosette guilty of felony vandalism (Pen. Code § 594, subd. (b)(1)), and the trial court sentenced him to three years of formal probation, subject to various conditions. On appeal, Rosette challenges the probation condition requiring him to submit to warrantless search and seizure. He asserts the condition is unreasonable under People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481 (Lent) and is unconstitutionally overbroad. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Rosette CA4/1