P. v. Cody CA6
Defendant Loren Silverfox Cody pleaded no contest to possessing child pornography (Pen. Code, § 311.11, subd. (a)) and was granted probation. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s imposition of the probation conditions required by section 1203.067, subdivisions (b)(3) and (b)(4), and he contends that the use of the word “frequent” in another probation condition rendered that condition unconstitutionally vague. He also asserts that the trial court erred in failing to specify the statutory bases for the $900 in penalty assessments it imposed in association with the $300 section 290.3 fine. We reject his challenges to the statutorily mandated probation conditions, but we modify the other challenged probation condition to replace “frequent” with “visit or remain in.” We also modify the court’s order to specify the statutory bases for the $900 in penalty assessments associated with the section 290.3 fine.
Comments on P. v. Cody CA6