P. v. Berliner CA6
Defendant Steven David Berliner pleaded no contest to possessing child pornography (Pen. Code, § 311.11, subd. (a)) and was granted probation. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s imposition of the probation conditions required by section 1203.067, subdivisions (b)(3) and (b)(4), and he contends that the use of the word “frequent” in another probation condition rendered that condition unconstitutionally vague. We reject his challenges to the statutorily mandated probation conditions, but we modify the other challenged probation condition to replace “frequent” with “visit or remain in.”
Comments on P. v. Berliner CA6