P. v. Placido CA6
Defendant Miguel Arias Placido pleaded no contest to assault with intent to commit rape, a registrable sex offense, and was placed on probation for three years, subject to various conditions.
On appeal, Placido challenges the probation condition requiring him to waive his privilege against self-incrimination. He also contends that the trial court erred in (1) imposing a monthly probation supervision fee, without determining that he had the ability to pay and given insufficient evidence in the record of his ability to pay, and (2) imposing “sex offender management program participation fees” without determining the amount. He further contends there are errors in the sentencing minute order that require correction.
Comments on P. v. Placido CA6