Baillie v. Tucker CA1/3
This appeal arises from a lawsuit brought by plaintiff/appellant Kathrine Rosas, as private attorney general and on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated persons, against numerous defendants based upon their purported involvement in illegal internet payday loan practices. The particular rulings challenged herein are the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for further discovery and grant of the motion to quash service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction and to dismiss filed by specially appearing defendants/respondents Blaine Tucker and Scott Tucker (hereinafter, the Tuckers). The Tuckers argued, and the trial court agreed, that there was no evidence in this record of their involvement in usurious lending activity intentionally directed at California and that plaintiff’s efforts to obtain relevant evidence that might be in the possession of a group of named defendants not involved in this appeal, referred to herein as the “Tribal Entities,” are
Comments on Baillie v. Tucker CA1/3