X.F. v. Superior Court CA1/3
Petitioner X.F., mother of two-year old U.M., challenges the Contra Costa County Juvenile Court’s June 21, 2017 order setting a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing and denying her reunification services. Specifically, mother argues that the juvenile court erred when it concluded that mother failed to establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that it was in U.M.’s best interest that she receive reunification services. In addition, mother contends that the juvenile court erred when it reduced her visitation with minor at the time it set the section 366.26 hearing. Having reviewed each of mother’s contentions, we conclude they lack merit. Accordingly, and for the reasons given below, we deny the petition.
Comments on X.F. v. Superior Court CA1/3