P. v. Ramirez CA2/7
A jury convicted Robert Antonio Ramirez of two counts of attempted murder, two counts of assault with a firearm and one count of shooting at an inhabited dwelling and found true special criminal street gang and firearm-use enhancement allegations. On appeal Ramirez, who was found guilty on an aiding and abetting theory, contends his convictions should be reversed because the natural and probable consequences doctrine relied on by the People was inapplicable to the facts of the case. Ramirez also contends the gang expert’s opinion was based on inadmissible testimonial hearsay and there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding the charged offenses were committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Ramirez CA2/7