Sullivan v. Cohen CA2/1
Appellant Batsheva Cohen contends that the mutual restraining order that the trial court issued should not have been mutual but should have issued only against her neighbor Constance Sullivan. We disagree.
Substantial evidence supports the factual findings necessary to support the order, and Cohen has not demonstrated that the trial court abused its discretion in issuing a restraining order against her. We affirm.
Comments on Sullivan v. Cohen CA2/1