In re E.E. CA2/3
Father, I.E., appeals from an order sustaining dependency jurisdiction over his infant daughter, E.E., pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a), (b) and (j), and a disposition order removing her from his physical custody. The court found Father’s physical abuse of E.E.’s half-siblings put the infant at substantial risk of suffering serious physical harm. Father contends there was no substantial evidence to support jurisdiction or the disposition order, because, at the time the court made the orders, he had completed a parenting class and was engaged in individual counseling to address anger management issues. We disagree and affirm.
Comments on In re E.E. CA2/3