P. v. Stobaugh CA1/1
Defendant Richard Thomas Stobaugh appeals from his commitment to the State Department of State Hospitals (DSH) after a jury found he was a sexually violent predator. Defendant contends the trial court’s commitment order violated his due process rights because no substantial evidence supported a finding of current dangerousness due to a mental disorder or serious difficulty controlling his behavior. He also contends the commitment order is not supported by sufficient evidence because the experts relied on hearsay statements not independently proven in formulating their opinions. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Stobaugh CA1/1