legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Nicole M. CA1/5
This appeal presents a sad tale of parents who, through no fault of their own, had a child born with several serious congenital heart defects. Nicole M. was removed from the custody of Ronald M. (Father) and Evelyn M. (Mother) when they proved unable to meet her complex medical needs after surgery. (See Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300, subd. (b).) By the six-month review hearing, Father and Mother had failed to make progress with their case plans and the juvenile court terminated reunification services and scheduled a section 366.26 hearing. Father filed a section 388 petition, seeking reunification or renewed services based on Nicole’s stabilized medical condition and his recent case plan progress. At a combined hearing, the juvenile court denied Father’s section 388 petition and terminated the parental rights of both parents. Father appeals, arguing the court abused its discretion in denying his section 388 petition because he demonstrated a change in circumstances and that re

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale