Kamel v. Cal. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitat
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment against him in his action alleging defendant retaliated against him, as an independent contractor performing services for defendant, an employee of defendant, or an applicant for employment with defendant, for complaining of sexual harassment and discrimination based on race or national origin. Plaintiff contends the trial court improperly refused to give certain jury instructions, improperly admitted certain evidence over his objection, and improperly awarded defendant its litigation costs. Further, he contends opposing counsel committed misconduct by arguing in his closing argument matters unsupported by the evidence presented at trial. Defendant cross-appeals, contending that, if the judgment should be reversed as asserted by plaintiff, this court should review and reverse the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to bring the case to trial within the statutory time. We find no error in the judgment and therefor
Comments on Kamel v. Cal. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitat