P. v. Roldan CA6
Defendant Nohely Stephany Roldan was granted probation after she pleaded no contest to second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). She contends that three probation conditions relating to her use of electronic devices are invalid under People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481 (Lent), unconstitutionally overbroad, and unconstitutionally vague. We conclude that the probation conditions are unconstitutionally vague and reverse the order for further proceedings.
Comments on P. v. Roldan CA6