In re B.L. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant, J.L. (father), challenges the juvenile court’s order terminating his visitation with his children, B.L., L.L., and J.L., Jr. At the time the court made this order, this case was well beyond the reunification stage, and the children were in a planned permanent living arrangement (PPLA) with their foster mother. Father contends the court erred because it based its order solely on the children’s wishes, and substantial evidence did not otherwise support the court’s order. We do not agree with father’s assertion that the court based its decision solely on the children’s wishes and did not exercise its own judgment. The record contains ample evidence that continued visitation with father would have been detrimental to the children’s physical or emotional well-being. We therefore affirm.
Comments on In re B.L. CA4/2