In re Chelsea P.
This is an appeal following a six-month review hearing in juvenile dependency proceedings. Appellant’s sole claim on appeal, however, relates to the appointment of a guardian ad litem in a prior hearing. Appellant, mother, waived her right to appeal the guardianship ruling by failing to timely challenge that ruling; Appellant may not now raise that challenge on the appeal of a subsequent order. Moreover, even if court were to reach the merits of Appellant’s claim, court would find that a guardian was properly appointed to represent appellant. Thus, court affirms.
Comments on In re Chelsea P.