legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Elvin v. Elvin
Appellant appeals from an order entering judgment based upon settlement of an action between him and various parties, including his brother. The settlement agreement determined control of a trust created by Jon and Arthur’s mother. Appellant appeals from the trial court’s order entering judgment consistent with the settlement agreement, which among other things, replaces Arthur and appoints Jon as the successor trustee of the mother’s Trust. Appellant makes three contentions: 1) that he was denied due process because the trial judge coerced him into settling the dispute, 2) that he was denied due process because the trial court did not grant him a continuance to retain counsel, and 3) that appellant was denied an opportunity for a trial. We conclude that the settlement agreement was enforceable and that Appellant has failed to show any cognizable error. Court affirms the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale