P. v. Mitich CA4/1
Defendants Robert Lewis Stevenson and Stojan Charles Mitich were part of a conspiracy to deposit a fraudulent check into Mitich's bank account and then withdraw most of that money within a few days. Stevenson appeals a judgment following jury verdicts convicting him of conspiracy to commit grand theft (count 1, Pen. Code, § 182, subd. (a)), unlawful use of personal identifying information of another (count 2, § 530.5, subd. (a)), second degree burglary (counts 3, 5-13, § 459), and grand theft of personal property valued in excess of $950 (count 4, § 487, subd. (a)). In his appeal, Stevenson contends: (1) there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions on counts 3, 4, and 5; (2) his sentences on either count 1 or counts 9, 12, and 13 must be stayed pursuant to section 654; (3) counts 3 through 13 must be consolidated into one offense pursuant to the Bailey doctrine; (4) several of the probation conditions imposed by the trial court are overbroad and should be stri
Comments on P. v. Mitich CA4/1