P. v. Bonner CA3
Defendant Roger Earl Bonner, Jr., contends he had a right to be personally present at a hearing on his petition for resentencing brought pursuant to Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2), and his absence from the hearing was prejudicial. Finding no prejudice, we will affirm the trial court’s order denying defendant’s petition for resentencing. Because we address defendant’s contentions on the merits, we do not address his alternative forfeiture contention regarding ineffective assistance.
Comments on P. v. Bonner CA3