P. v. Mondragon CA4/1
A jury found Juan Pinal Mondragon (Pinal) guilty of one count of inflicting an injury causing a traumatic condition on a person with whom he had a dating relationship (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)), and one count of possessing narcotics paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364).
Pinal contends that the trial court prejudicially erred because it concluded that Evidence Code section 352 did not require the exclusion of two recordings in which a witness described seeing Pinal punch the victim in the face in an altercation that occurred on the same evening that Pinal committed the acts for which Pinal was prosecuted in this case. We conclude that Pinal's argument is without merit, and accordingly we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Mondragon CA4/1