legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Wild, Carter & Tipton v. Yeager CA5
Appellants Victoria Scott Yeager (Mrs. Yeager) and Charles E. Yeager (General Yeager; collectively, the Yeagers) appeal a judgment to enforce a settlement agreement with respondents Wild, Carter, & Tipton (WCT). The Yeagers claim the trial court erred in granting WCT’s motion to enforce the agreement. They specifically contend (1) the trial court violated General Yeager’s civil rights, (2) the Yeagers did not understand the material terms of the settlement agreement, (3) the trial court lacks jurisdiction to enforce the agreement, (4) a valid contract was not formed because there was no meeting of the minds, (5) the record is incomplete, (6) the agreement was based on fraud, (7) the court exceeded its jurisdiction by ordering a nonparty to comply with the settlement agreement, (8) WCT violated the confidentiality agreement, and (9) the agreement was executed under duress. The Yeagers also claim certain records ordered sealed by the trial court should not remain under seal.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale