legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hart CA2/4
Appellant Taro Hart appeals from a five year prison sentence following his conviction for grand theft of personal property. Appellant contends his sentence, which was enhanced as a result of a prior conviction and prison term, was unauthorized because no evidence was submitted to prove the prior conviction. Respondent concedes the sentence was unauthorized, and requests this court remand the matter for a new trial on the prior conviction allegations. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the sentence was unauthorized and that remand is the appropriate remedy. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction, vacate the sentence, and remand for further proceedings.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale