P. v. Nateras CA2/4
Michael Nateras challenges the imposition of gang enhancements following his conviction by jury on one count of shooting at an occupied motor vehicle (Pen. Code, § 246) and one count of assault with a firearm (§ 245, subd. (a)(2)). Appellant contends there is insufficient evidence of a connection between gang subsets to support the gang allegation. He also challenges the gang enhancement jury instruction, and he contends the gang expert’s testimony was inadmissible hearsay testimony and violated the confrontation clause. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Nateras CA2/4