In re D.H. CA1/4
In this dependency appeal, L.H. (mother) challenges juvenile court orders which led to the removal of her three children—D.H. (born January 2006), D.H.2 (born December 2009), and D.H.3 (born July 2012)—from her custody. Specifically, mother argues that the juvenile court’s finding under section 387 of the Welfare and Institutions Code—that the previous dispositional order had not been effective to protect the minors—must be reversed because it was not supported by substantial evidence. Mother also claims that the juvenile court’s subsequent dispositional order removing her three children from her care was not sufficiently supported by evidence of risk to the minors and that reasonable means existed to keep the minors safe without removal. Having reviewed this matter in detail, we see no error requiring reversal of the juvenile court’s challenged findings and orders. We therefore affirm.
Comments on In re D.H. CA1/4