legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Ayden B. CA5
Adrianne M. (mother) received reunification services for two years four months after her children were placed in custody in September 2014 pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 because mother and father were arrested for being under the influence of methamphetamine. After a contested hearing on January 31, 2017, over whether mother’s parental rights should be terminated (§ 366.26), the juvenile court ruled the parent-child exception did not apply and it terminated mother’s parental rights to Ayden B. (then four years old) and Kobe B. (then three years old) by written order on February 9, 2017. Mother contends on appeal she had a close bond with both children and the juvenile court erred in failing to apply the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to the statutory preference for adoption. We find no error and affirm the juvenile court’s orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale